By kazinator
The only issue is that people were forced to pay for Windows when buying a PC for running a different operating system. PC hardware OEM’s paid royalties to Microsoft whether or not users installed Microsoft systems, and the OEM’s passed down this cost indiscriminately. That’s an example of monopoly power: I want to buy just a PC, without a hundred-something dollar OS, but I can’t.
As for bundling of IE, Microsoft has a right to put whatever they want into their software release otherwise. People who use Windows and then complain that it comes bundled with a Microsoft (gasp!) web browser can be safely regarded as supreme morons.
Moreover, the history of Windows is full of entitled whiners whose application or utility became irrelevant when Microsoft realized that an OS should ship with that kind of thing and produced an equivalent. According to those pitiful nincompoops, the OS vendor has no right to bundle things such as a TCP/IP stack, disk compression or anti-malware utilities, because it threatens their “add-ons”. (Nobody would have even used their add-ons for the narrow window of time when they were relevant, were it not for that OS vendor’s installed base.)
Google runs a program on some machines in the cloud that only respond when you resolve their name and send them a TCP/IP SYN packet. Every search starts with someone resolving “google.com” or similar and making the first contact.
link
See more about this article by clicking the link here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10133765
kazinator comments on "Google rejects EU's search abuse complaint"